About Myneuromind
A retailer that publishes what it found, including the parts that do not help sell anything.
Myneuromind is the U.S. stocking partner for NeuroMind operating from 500 Park Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10022, with returns handled at 437 Madison Avenue, Floor 24, New York, NY 10022. We are not the manufacturer; the label says distributed by Neuromind Pro, Aurora, CO 80011, USA. We earn a commission on orders placed through this site. Our editorial rules are that the printed label beats every other source, that nothing is invented, and that anything missing is printed as missing.
Who we are
Myneuromind is a retail and review desk for one product. We take orders, we publish what the label says, and we say what we think of it.
We are not the manufacturer and we do not pretend otherwise. The label reads distributed by Neuromind Pro, Aurora, CO 80011, USA, as printed on the label, with the telephone number +1 507 448 8190 and the address [email protected]. No manufacturer is named on the pack at all.
Our office is 500 Park Avenue, Floor 8, New York, NY 10022. Returns are handled at 437 Madison Avenue, Floor 24, New York, NY 10022. The order desk is +1 (877) 257-0710 and this website's own address is [email protected].
Those are the only addresses and numbers connected with this site. We have not invented an extra street, a laboratory, a licence or a head office to look larger than we are.
The five rules we write by
The printed label wins. Where the label and the brief disagree, the label is right and the disagreement gets printed. There are seven such conflicts on this product and they are all listed on the home page.
Never invent a fact. No price, no doctor, no laboratory, no testimonial, no study and no PubMed ID that we cannot point at. Anything we do not have is printed as not published.
Only cite what we opened. Every source in our reference list is a page we read. Where a source reports its own weaknesses, we quote those too.
Never write FDA approved. No supplement is. We write made in an FDA-registered facility, and then we explain what that means.
Publish the criticism on the same page as the buy button. Not in a footer, not behind a link. The first substantive section of our home page is about the phrase on the front of the bottle.
Because the alternative is a page that agrees with everything and is therefore worth nothing. A reader who can see us criticise the product we sell has some reason to believe the rest.
How we make money, stated plainly
Orders placed through the buy buttons on this site earn this site a commission. That is the whole of our funding model and there is nothing hidden about it.
It creates an obvious incentive to be positive, and the honest way to handle an incentive is to disclose it and then act against it where the evidence requires.
So: this site scores the product it sells 2.1 out of 5, and the highest-scoring rows are both about the label rather than the formula. It publishes ten things the label does not tell you. It refuses to print a star rating because the one we were given is marked as layout copy. It opens its home page with the caffeine.
None of that is good for conversion. All of it is on the site.

We are a retailer for one product and a review desk for the same one. That is a conflict of interest, we state it on five pages, and the way we handle it is to publish everything we found — including a chart showing that the bacopa in this capsule delivers a fifteenth of the dose the studies used.
Where our sources disagree with each other
| Conflict | What we did |
|---|---|
| The social share card is a different product entirely | The asset pack supplied for this product contains a square teal share card — the image that would appear when the page is posted to social media — showing a brown glass dropper bottle labelled <b>SUGAR HARMONY, BLOOD SUGAR SUPORT, 2 FL OZ</b>. NeuroMind Pro is a white bottle of thirty capsules for cognitive support. It is not a liquid, it is not 2 fl oz, and it has nothing to do with blood sugar. The word <i>support</i> is also misspelled on that card. We have published the image on this page because it is evidence, and we have kept it off every other page because it is not this product. |
| The marketing photograph shows ingredients that are not in the capsule | The product scene supplied with the pack stands the bottle in front of a <b>ginkgo leaf</b>, a <b>lion's mane mushroom</b>, <b>blueberries</b> and sprigs of rosemary and thyme. Not one of those appears on the Supplement Facts panel. The panel lists three B vitamins and a 151 mg blend of caffeine, tyrosine, theacrine, theobromine, bacopa, rhodiola and huperzia. Ginkgo and lion's mane are both well-known nootropic ingredients, which is presumably why they are in the photograph; they are not in the product. The label wins. |
| The brand's own name is spelled two different ways on one wrap | The front panel mark reads <b>NEURMINDPRO</b>. The distributor block on the other end of the same printed wrap reads <b>Neuromind Pro</b>. One of those is missing a letter. It changes nothing about what is in the capsule, but it is on the bottle and it is checkable, so it is recorded here. |
| A disclaimer asterisk pointing at nothing | The boxed FDA disclaimer begins with an asterisk: <i>*These statements have not been evaluated…</i>. On a normal label that asterisk ties back to starred structure-function claims on the front panel. This front panel makes no claim at all, so there is no starred statement anywhere for it to refer to. Harmless, and the opposite of the usual error. |
| A footnote symbol that appears nowhere else on the panel | The first footnote reads <i>**Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet</i>. A double asterisk marks it, and no double asterisk appears beside any value in the panel. We enlarged the three percentage figures to check. Typographic rather than substantive, but a footnote marker with nothing to mark is still an error. |
| Two country-of-origin badges, one of them broken | The listing carries a correctly qualified <i>Foreign and domestic ingredients</i> roundel and, separately, a stars-and-stripes roundel whose ring reads <b>MANUFACTURE IN</b> across the top and <b>MANUFACTURE IN</b> again across the bottom, so the sentence never completes. The label itself makes no country-of-origin claim at all. The qualified badge is the one consistent with the label, and the broken one should not be in circulation. |
| A 100% natural roundel on a panel of synthesised vitamin forms | The panel declares thiamine hydrochloride, pyridoxine hydrochloride and methylcobalamin, plus caffeine and standardised extracts. These are ordinary, disclosed, manufactured materials. <i>Natural</i> has no regulatory definition for a supplement, so the roundel is not false so much as empty. |
| A doctor-formulated mark with no doctor | No clinician is named on the label, on the listing, or in any document supplied to us, and unlike several products this desk has reviewed there is not even a stock photograph to caption. We have not invented a formulator. |
What nobody published about this product
- How much of anything is in the blend. Seven ingredients share 151 mg and not one of them carries a number. Everything this product is sold for is inside that line.
- How much caffeine is in a capsule. It is first in the blend, so it is the largest ingredient by weight, and it could be anywhere from roughly 22 mg to 151 mg. A buyer counting toward the FDA's 400 mg a day cannot start.
- How much huperzine A is in a capsule. The 1% standardisation puts the ceiling at 216 mcg, which is inside the 50–200 mcg twice-daily range used in studies of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. This is the single most important number on the label and it is not printed.
- A street address for the distributor. 21 CFR 101.5 permits the omission only where the firm is listed in a current city or telephone directory, so the label is relying on an exemption rather than giving the address.
- The name of the manufacturer. The label says <i>distributed by</i>, which does not identify who made the capsule.
- A time of day for the dose. On a capsule whose largest blend ingredient is caffeine, “take one capsule daily” leaves out the one piece of timing advice that matters.
- Any interaction statement. Three ingredients in this blend carry documented interaction cautions — huperzine A with anticholinergics, Alzheimer drugs and cholinergic glaucoma medicines, tyrosine with MAOIs and in thyroid disease, rhodiola with losartan. The caution panel's general advice to consult a physician is doing all of that work.
- The name of the doctor behind the doctor-formulated badge. No clinician is named anywhere in the material supplied to us.
- Any certifying body for the non-GMO, GMP, gluten-free or dairy-free marks, and any certificate or registration number for the FDA-registered facility badge.
- A price. Nothing was published to us in advance, so the checkout is the only figure.
- Verified reviews. The block supplied in the brief is marked in that same document as layout copy, so it is not evidence and we have not printed it as such.
- A certificate of analysis. A lot code and a CoA reference were supplied, and the brief describes them as draft labels rather than lab proof.
- Why the blend totals 151 mg. It is an oddly specific number for a formula that discloses none of its parts, and nothing explains how it was arrived at.
Who writes this
If anything on this site is wrong, tell us and we will fix it and say that we did. Write to [email protected], Monday to Friday, 9:00 am to 5:00 pm ET. That address handles pages, typos, privacy and press; it cannot see orders, and for anything about an order the desk on +1 (877) 257-0710 is the number that works.
About Myneuromind: common questions
Who runs this website?
We are the U.S. stocking partner for NeuroMind. We sell the product and we wrote this review of it, which is a conflict of interest and the reason every critical figure here is sourced and every source is linked.
Who makes it?
Not stated. The label says <i>distributed by</i> Neuromind Pro of Aurora, Colorado, which identifies the distributor rather than the manufacturer. No facility is named anywhere.
Do you make money if I buy?
Yes. We are a stocking partner, so a purchase through this site earns us money. That is why the dosage page leads with ceilings rather than benefits.
What did you score it?
2.1 out of 5, across eight weighted categories. The claim honesty score is the highest this desk has given, at 4.5, because the front panel claims nothing. The stimulant disclosure score is the lowest it has given, at 0.5, because three methylxanthines share one unstated total.
Why are there no reviews on this site?
Because we have none we can verify. The brief supplied a star score, an order count and eight named testimonials, and the same document states that the reviews, star scores and order counts in it are layout copy. We do not print invented people.
Which number do I call?
+1 (877) 257-0710 for anything to do with an order — tracking, changes, refunds. The website email address, [email protected], cannot see orders; it is for pages, typos, privacy and press.
Is it FDA approved?
No dietary supplement is. The FDA “does not have the authority to approve dietary supplements before they are marketed”. The badge on the listing says FDA <i>registered facility</i>, which means the factory filed an administrative registration with the agency. It is not an inspection result and it is not an endorsement, and no facility or registration number is given here to look up.
Ready to try NeuroMind Pro?
One bottle is 30 capsules at one a day, so a bottle is exactly thirty days and the front of the label says so. The 60-day guarantee runs from purchase, not from delivery, and the price is shown at checkout.
Order NowRead the label firstNo price was published to us. We print no figure we have not seen ourselves. · 60-day guarantee from purchase · Not for under 18, pregnancy or nursing